Received: from relay5.UU.NET (relay5.UU.NET [192.48.96.15]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id SAA21004 for <dwarner@albany.net>; Thu, 4 Jan 1996 18:25:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from garcia.com by relay5.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQzxcv23374; Thu, 4 Jan 1996 18:16:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from (localhost) by garcia.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA05793; Thu, 4 Jan 1996 18:16:33 -0500
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 1996 18:16:33 -0500
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Message-Id: <1184.6577T1102T862@monmouth.com>
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: rcohen@monmouth.com (Robert Cohen)
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Re: I hate garcia.com!
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
>Remember, if you get desparate and Webcom looks bleak, there's always the
>possibility of a dedicated deal. I could buy a cheap P75 or P100 system,
>install Linux, get another phone line, two 28.8K modems and get a dedicated
>link going. We'd have control of the vertical, horizontal... Or perhaps
>NewTek can hire me and I'd set 'em up with a system for ftp, web and mailing
>lists... :)
>Time to hit them search engines and ping some ISPs again...
>Dan
>Sure hope you don't hate me for letting you take over... I sure as heck
>didn't expect any of this to happen. I'D LOVE to have a dedicated type deal
>with a 56K or faster link and more storage for FTP and the lists in addition
>to allowing list members to have their own web pages showcasing their work.
>I GOTTA win the lotto!
Even a dedicated system which traded message packets once every hour or so
would be a great improvement... And probably be much cheaper than a dedicated